Mar. 06, 2020 |
|
Mar. 31, 2024 |
|
jRCTs051190119 |
Assessment of global coagulation function under treatment of emicizumab concomitant with bypassing |
|
UNEBI Study |
Mar. 31, 2023 |
|
38 |
|
Baseline background characteristics for the full study population and the efficacy analysis population (participants in the study who had events only, Full Analysis Set; FAS) are shown below (summarized as median [minimum, maximum] or frequency (%)). Full study population N=38 Age: 25 [7, 67]. Factor 8 inhibitor level: 3.5 [0.0, 2191.2]. History of emicizumab use (months): 44[0, 89] Hemophilia A severity: Mild (>=5%): 3 (7.9%) Moderate (1-5%): 3 (7.9%) Severe (<1%): 32 (84.2%) Bypass drug use to date FEIBA: 30 (78.9%) NovoSeven: 34 (89.5%) Byclot: 6 (15.8%) Others: 15 (39.5%) Efficacy analysis population (FAS) N=18 Age: 27[7, 61] Factor 8 inhibitor level: 3.0 [0.4, 121.2]. History of emicizumab use (months): 46[1, 89] Hemophilia A severity: Mild (>=5%): 0 (0.0%) Moderate (1-5%): 2 (11.1%) Severe (<1%): 16 (88.9%) Bypass drug use to date FEIBA 13 (72.2%) NovoSeven: 14 (77.8%) Byclot: 3 (16.7%) Others: 6 (33.3%) |
|
2020/03/19: Date of first participant enrollment 2020/03/24: Date of first event 2022/09/30: Date of last event 2023/03/13: Date of last visit |
|
In the safety analysis population (overall study participant population, N=38), the incidence of adverse events after study enrollment was 2.6% (1 case, 2 events), and there were 0 events for which a causal relationship to the study drug (emicizumab) could not be ruled out. The incidence of serious adverse events was 2.6% (1 case, 1 event). Details of serious adverse events are given below. no AESI were occurred. Serious adverse events Infectious cholecystitis (1 case, 2.6%, no causal relationship) |
|
Analyses for bleeding events included only first-ever events for each study participant (First Event Analysis Set; FEAS). Primary endpoint The mean [95% confidence interval (95%CI)] of the "Degree of improvement in maximum coagulation rate by coagulation waveform analysis before and after administration of fixed-dose bypass hemostatic agents" ranged from 5.63 [5.25 to 6.00] (before administration) to 6.33 [6.01 to 6.65] (after administration). Relative to the Nara Medical University Hospital Institutional Reference Value (0%, 4.49*; 100%, 7.51), the relative values ranged from 37.6% [25.2% to 49.9%] (before administration) to 60.9% [50.2% to 71.5%] (after administration). * Reference value for 0% was the mean value of all samples in regular visit (n=93) with addition of anti-emicizumab antibody. Secondary endpoint 1. Comparative evaluation with and without addition of anti-emicizumab antibody for changes of comprehensive coagulation parameter before and after administration of bypass hemostatic agents The mean [95%CI] of the maximum coagulation velocity with anti-emicizumab antibody addition ranged from 4.57 [4.32 to 4.83] (before administration) to 6.18 [5.86 to 6.49] (after administration) (without anti-emicizumab antibody addition, the results are the same as for the primary endpoint). The relative response rate was 2.7% [-5.7% to 11.2%] (before administration) to 55.8% [45.4% to 66.2%] (after administration) when relative to the institutional reference value of Nara Medical University Hospital (0%, 4.49; 100%, 7.51). (without anti-emicizumab antibody addition, the results are the same as for the primary endpoint). 2. Efficacy evaluation of emicizumab with and without addition of anti-emicizumab antibody using comprehensive coagulation tests in regular samples The mean [95%CI] maximum coagulation velocity at 0, 12, and 24 months was 5.49 [5.28 to 5.71] at 0 months, 5.53 [5.28 to 5.78] at 12 months, and 5.40 [5.13 to 5.68] at 24 months without anti-emicizumab antibody addition. On the other hand, 4.50 [4.36 to 4.64] at 0 months, 4.58 [4.41 to 4.75] at 12 months, and 4.39 [4.22 to 4.57] at 24 months for those with anti-emicizumab antibodies added. Relative to the Nara Medical University Hospital Institutional Reference Value (0%, 4.49; 100%, 7.51), the results were 33.3% [26.0% to 40.5%] for 0 months, 34.5% [26.1% to 42.8%] for 12 months, 30.2% [21.0% to 39.4%] for 24 months without anti-emicizumab antibody addition, 0% [-4.4% to 4.8%] at 0 months, 2.9% [-2.8% to 8.5%] at 12 months, and -3.2% [-9.0% to 2.6%] at 24 months with anti-emicizumab antibody added. 3. Evaluation of hemostasis status and occurrence of TMA or TE in clinical symptoms Hemostatic conditions were "effective" in 15 patients (83.3%, including 5 cases of hemorrhage due to rupture and 10 cases of surgery), "ineffective" in 0 patients (0.0%), "exacerbation" in 0 patients (0.0%), and "difficult to determine" in 3 patients (16.7%, including 2 events of hemorrhage due to rupture and 1 event of surgery). The incidence of TMA and TE was 0 in all patients. 4. Evaluation of general coagulation and hematological tests before and after bypass hemostatic agents administration, and that in regular samples The mean [95% CI] of each test value before administration of the bypass drug were as follows: Platelets: 27.38 [23.57 to 31.20]. FDP: 2.29 [0.28 to 4.31]. D-Dimer: 1.00[0.00 to 2.00]. PIC: 0.71[0.14 to 1.27] TAT: 3.21 [1.71 to 4.70]. The mean [95% CI] of each test value after administration of the bypass formulation were as follows: Platelets: 27.25 [23.16 to 31.34]. FDP: 2.47 [0.63 to 4.31]. D-Dimer: 0.92 [0.04 to 1.80]. PIC: 0.64[0.25 to 1.02] TAT: 5.43[3.18 to 7.68] The mean [95% CI] of each test value in periodic samples (0, 12, and 24 months) is as follows Platelets: 0 months: 26.32 [24.25 to 28.38]. 12 months: 25.50 [23.79 to 27.21]. 24 months: 25.41 [23.13 to 27.69] FDP: 0 month: 1.38 [1.11 to 1.64] 12 months: 1.55 [1.22 to 1.87] 24 months: 1.21 [0.97 to 1.46]. D-Dimer: 0 month: 0.28 [0.21 to 0.36] 12 months: 0.44[0.27 to 0.61] 24 months: 0.61 [0.49 to 0.73]. PIC: 0 month: 0.45[0.35 to 0.55] 12 months: 0.50[0.40 to 0.59] 24 months: 0.49 [0.36 to 0.62] TAT: 0 months: 1.91 [1.01 to 2.80] 12 months: 1.60 [1.30 to 1.91] 24 months: 1.17 [0.91 to 1.43] |
|
In concomitant use of bypassing agent for breakthrough bleeding or surgical procedure of emicizumab-treated hemophilia A patients with inhibitor, recombinant activated factor 7 concentrate at dose of 90 or less micrograms/kg was effective and safe. The modified clot waveform analysis with optimized reagent for coagulation trigger was useful in these settings. |
|
Mar. 31, 2024 |
|
Aug. 31, 2024 |
|
Yes |
|
Data availability statements: The individual de-identified participant data will be shared upon reasonable request to the Contact for Scientific Queries. The data will become available from the end of the study until 5 years. Data sharing will be limited to requests from non-profit investigators and will be provided as electronic records. |
|
https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs051190119 |
Nogami Keiji |
||
Nara Medical University Hospital |
||
840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara,Japan |
||
+81-744-22-3051 |
||
roc-noga@naramed-u.ac.jp |
||
Ogiwara Kenichi |
||
Nara Medical University Hospital |
||
840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara,Japan |
||
+81-744-22-3051 |
||
ogiwarak@naramed-u.ac.jp |
Complete |
Mar. 06, 2020 |
||
Mar. 19, 2020 | ||
60 | ||
Interventional |
||
non-randomized controlled trial |
||
open(masking not used) |
||
active control |
||
single assignment |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1. Congenital Hemophilia A with inhibitors over 4 years old |
||
1. Patients who have difficulty in regular visits and/or visits at the event |
||
4age old over | ||
No limit | ||
Male |
||
HemophiliaA with Inhibitor |
||
Selection and administration dose of bypass hemostatic agents in rupture hemorrhage and hemostasis management during surgery |
||
Degree of improvement in maximum coagulation rate by coagulation waveform analysis before and after administration of fixed-dose bypass hemostatic agents |
||
1. Comparative evaluation with and without addition of anti-emicizumab antibody for changes of comprehensive coagulation parameter before and after administration of bypass hemostatic agents |
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd | |
Not applicable |
Nara Medical University Certified Review Board | |
840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara | |
+81-744-29-8835 |
|
ethics_nara@naramed-u.ac.jp | |
Approval | |
Jan. 29, 2020 |
none |