Nov. 05, 2019 |
|
May. 01, 2022 |
|
jRCTs032190128 |
A comparative study of erythema reaction using ultraviolet therapy devices with different irradiance |
|
A comparison of erythema reaction in two ultraviolet irradiation devices |
May. 14, 2020 |
|
15 |
|
Age 46.3 plus/minus10.2 (mean plus/minus SD), 8 females, 7 males, 8 with medical history/complications, 11 with medications in use, 12 with Fitzpatrick 2, 3 with 3 |
|
15 enrolled cases, 15 safety analysis set, 15 full analysis set (FAS), 15 per protocol Set (PPS) conforming to the study protocol |
|
No adverse events or serious adverse events occurred except for 2 minor reversible pigmentation. |
|
Primary endpoint Difference in erythema value (mexameter) There is a significant difference between 100 mJ/cm2 and 200 mJ/cm2 (p<0.05) Secondary evaluation item 1) Difference in erythema value (spectrophotometer CM-700d) No significant difference 2) Difference in erythema value in dermoscopy image There is a significant difference between 80 mJ/cm2 and 200 mJ/cm2 (p<0.05) 3) Number of micropapules in dermoscopy images Not observed 4) Number of vesicles in dermoscopy image Not observed 5) Judgment of average MED of each irradiance 50mW/cm2: 129.3plus/minus26.0 mJ/cm2 (average plus/minus SD) 150mW/cm2: 96.0plus/minus3.5 mJ/cm2 (average plus/minus SD) 6) Judgment of postoperative pigmentation (PIH) in dermoscopy images Day2 (24 hours later) None: 3 cases, suspicious: 12 cases Day169 None: 3 cases, suspicious: 4 cases, mild 8 cases |
|
Significant differences were observed in the difference in erythema value (mesameter) of the primary endpoint and the difference in erythema value in the dermoscopy image of the secondary endpoint. No adverse events were observed, except for two reversible minor pigmentations. |
|
May. 01, 2022 |
|
May. 01, 2022 |
|
No |
|
No plan |
|
https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs032190128 |
Togawa Yaei |
||
Chiba university |
||
1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan |
||
+81-43-222-7171 |
||
togawa-yk@faculty.chiba-u.jp |
||
Togawa Yaei |
||
Chiba university |
||
1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan |
||
+81-43-222-7171 |
||
togawa-yk@faculty.chiba-u.jp |
Complete |
Nov. 05, 2019 |
||
Nov. 30, 2019 | ||
15 | ||
Interventional |
||
non-randomized controlled trial |
||
open(masking not used) |
||
dose comparison control |
||
parallel assignment |
||
treatment purpose |
||
Target patients who meet all the following conditions. |
||
1) photosensitivity |
||
20age old over | ||
65age old not | ||
Both |
||
Health Condition(s) |
||
Irradiate at 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, and 200 mJ/cm2, respectively, using ultraviolet therapy equipment at 50 mW/cm2 and 150 mW/cm2 |
||
Difference in erythema value |
||
1) The difference of erythema (spectrocolorimeter CM-700d) |
JMEC Corporation | |
Not applicable |
Chiba University Certified Clinical Research Review Board | |
1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, Chiba | |
+81-43-226-2616 |
|
prc-jim@chiba-u.jp | |
Approval | |
July. 16, 2019 |
none |