Aug. 22, 2016 |
|
Dec. 22, 2022 |
|
jRCT2080223300 |
A phase II study of Pro-NETU in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) |
|
- |
July. 27, 2018 |
|
594 |
|
The patients who are receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomized to placebo group or FosNTP 81 mg group or FosNTP 235 mg group both in combination with palonosetron (PALO) 0.75 mg and dexamethasone (DEX). |
|
A total of 594 patients was randomized. Seven patients did not receive the study drug. |
|
The incident rate of adverse events (AEs) and treatment-related AEs were similar between the 3 groups. There was no tendency noted for the rates of AEs to increase in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment-related AEs (>=5%) were constipation (13.8%, 14.2%, and 16.4%, respectively, in the placebo and FosNTP 81 mg and 235 mg groups) and hiccups (4.6%, 7.1%, and 5.6%, respectively, in the placebo and FosNTP 81 mg and 235 mg groups). Injection site reactions (ISRs)-related AEs were all grade 1 or 2, there was no tendency noted for the rate to increase in a dose-dependent manner (5.7%, 10.8%, and 7.9%, respectively, in the placebo and FosNTP 81 mg and 235 mg groups). |
|
The overall (0-120 h) complete response (CR; no emetic event and no rescue medication) rates were 54.7%, 63.8%, and 76.8%, respectively, in the placebo, FosNTP 81 mg, and 235-mg groups. The overall CR rate in the FosNTP 235 mg group was statistically superior to that in the placebo group (adjusted difference, 22.0%; 97.5% CI, 11.7% to 32.3% [P < .001; 2-sided significance level = .025]). There was not a statistically significant difference noted between the FosNTP 81 mg and placebo groups (adjusted difference, 9.1%; 95% CI, -0.4% to 18.6% [P = .061; 2-sided significance level = .05]). |
|
The rates of all secondary efficacy endpoints were higher in the FosNTP 235 mg group compared with the placebo group. |
|
FosNTP 235 mg group showed superior prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared with the placebo group, and with a satisfactory safety profile. |
|
Mar. 28, 2022 |
|
https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cncr.32429 |
No |
|
Data will not be shared according to the Sponsor policy on data sharing. Taiho policy on data sharing may be found at https://www.taiho.co.jp/en/science/policy/clinical_trial_information_disclosure_policy/index.html. |
|
https://www.clinicaltrials.jp/file/mrbidvFgd |
|
version:P01.04 date:April. 07, 2017 |
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
||
- |
||
- |
||
toiawaseCD1@taiho.co.jp |
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
||
- |
||
- |
||
toiawase@taiho.co.jp |
completed |
Sept. 05, 2016 |
||
585 | ||
Interventional |
||
Central registration, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, comparative study |
||
prevention purpose |
||
2 |
||
- Patients who are scheduled to receive cancer chemotherapy including the HEC agents |
||
- Patients with infection, diabetes mellitus, or other disease to whom it difficult to administer of DEX, which is defined in the protocol |
||
20age old over | ||
No limit | ||
Both |
||
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting |
||
investigational material(s) |
||
efficacy |
||
safety |
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | |
- |
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | |
Clinical Trial of Taiho |
Hokkaido University Hospital IRB | |
Kita 14, Nishi 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido | |
+81-11-706-7061 |
|
tiken@med.hokudai.ac.jp | |
approved | |
Aug. 30, 2016 |
JapicCTI-163355 | |
Japan |