May. 20, 2020 |
|
Sept. 05, 2021 |
|
jRCT2031200035 |
A Multicenter, Adaptive, Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Investigational Therapeutics for the Treatment of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Adults (Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT-2)) |
|
A Multicenter, Adaptive, Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Investigational Therapeutics for the Treatment of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Adults (ACTT-2 Baricitinib / Remdesivir Vs. Remdesivir Trial) |
July. 31, 2020 |
|
1033 |
|
The mean age of the patients was 55.4 years, and 63.1% were male. Overall, 48.0% of the patients were White, 15.1% were Black, 9.8% were Asian, and 1.0% were American Indian or Alaska Native; 51.4% were Hispanic or Latino. 92.3% of patients were enrolled at sites in North America, 1.3% in Europe, and 6.5% in Asia among 67 trial sites in 8 countries. |
|
Of 1067 patients assessed for eligibility, 1033 underwent randomization; 515 were assigned to the combination group (baricitinib plus remdesivir), and 518 to the control group (placebo plus remdesivir). The intention-to-treat population included 706 patients with moderate disease (ordinal score of 4 or 5 [not receiving ventilation]) and 327 with severe disease (ordinal score of 6 or 7 [receiving noninvasive or invasive ventilation]). Of those assigned to the combination group, 507 (98.4%) received treatment as assigned. Of those assigned to the control group, 509 (98.3%) received treatment as assigned. A total of 498 patients in the combination group and 495 in the control group completed the trial through day 29, recovered, or died. |
|
Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 207 patients (40.7%) in the combination group and 238 (46.8%) in the control group. A total of 25 grade 3 or 4 adverse events were judged by the principal investigators to be related to combination treatment and 28 to control. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurring in at least 5% of all patients were hyperglycemia, anemia, decreased lymphocyte count, and acute kidney injury. The incidence of these adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups. The percentage of patients who were reported to have a serious or nonserious adverse event of venous thromboembolism was similar in the combination group and the control group (21 patients [4.1%] and 16 patients [3.1%], respectively; difference, 1.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.3 to 3.3). The patients receiving baricitinib plus remdesivir had a significantly lower incidence of adverse events, adverse events leading to discontinuation of the trial drug, serious adverse events, serious adverse events with a fatal outcome, and infection-related adverse events than patients who received remdesivir alone. |
|
1. Primary Outcome Patients who received combination treatment with baricitinib plus remdesivir recovered a median of 1 day faster than patients who received remdesivir and placebo (median, 7 days vs. 8 days; rate ratio for recovery, 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.32; P=0.03 by log-rank test stratified according to actual baseline severity). When analyzed according to the severity entered at the time of randomization (moderate vs. severe), the hazard ratio was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.31; P=0.047). The median time to recovery among patients receiving noninvasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen (baseline ordinal score of 6) was 10 days in the combination group and 18 days in the control group (rate ratio for recovery, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.08). Among patients with a baseline score of 4 (no oxygen) and 5 (supplemental oxygen), the rate ratio for recovery was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.23) and 1.17 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.39), respectively. For those receiving mechanical ventilation or ECMO at enrollment (baseline ordinal score of 7), the rate ratio for recovery was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.59 to 1.97). The rate ratio for recovery among the 223 patients who received glucocorticoids for clinical indications during the trial was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.48). A sensitivity analysis with a random effect for hospital sites yielded similar results (conditional random-effects estimate of rate ratio for recovery, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33; restricted maximum likelihood-based random-effects estimate of variance, 0.0305). 2. Key Secondary Outcome The odds of improvement in clinical status at day 15 as assessed with the ordinal scale were greater in the combination group than in the control group (odds ratio for improvement, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.6). Patients with a baseline ordinal score of 6 who received combination treatment were most likely to have clinical improvement at day 15 (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.6. The odds of improvement in clinical status at day 15 as assessed with the ordinal scale were greater in the combination group than in the control group (odds ratio for improvement, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.6). Patients with a baseline ordinal score of 6 who received combination treatment were most likely to have clinical improvement at day 15 (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.6). |
|
Combination treatment with the antiinflammatory drug baricitinib and the antiviral drug remdesivir was superior to remdesivir alone for the treatment of hospitalized patients with Covid-19 pneumonia. The beneficial effects of the combination treatment were seen both in the primary outcome, with a shorter time to recovery, and in the key secondary outcome, with a greater improvement in clinical status as assessed on the ordinal scale. The combination was associated with fewer serious adverse events. |
|
Sept. 02, 2021 |
|
Dec. 11, 2020 |
|
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2031994 |
No |
|
https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2031200035 |
Ohmagari Norio |
||
Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine |
||
1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo Japan |
||
+81-3-3202-7181 |
||
nohmagari@hosp.ncgm.go.jp |
||
Mikami Ayako |
||
National Center for Global Health and Medicine |
||
1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo Japan |
||
+81-3-3202-7181 |
||
amikami@hosp.ncgm.go.jp |
Complete |
May. 20, 2020 |
||
June. 22, 2020 | ||
35 | ||
Interventional |
||
randomized controlled trial |
||
double blind |
||
placebo control |
||
parallel assignment |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1.Admitted to a hospital with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection. |
||
1. ALT or AST > 5 times the upper limit of normal. |
||
20age old over | ||
No limit | ||
Both |
||
Novel Coronavirus Infectious Disease (COVID-19) |
||
Dosing and Administration |
||
-The overall objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different investigational therapeutics relative to the control arm among hospitalized adults who have COVID-19. |
||
1.To evaluate the clinical efficacy of different investigational therapeutics as compared to the control arm as assessed by |
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare | |
Not applicable |
Institutional Review Board of Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine | |
1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo | |
+81-3-3202-7181 |
|
hifunazaki@hosp.ncgm.go.jp | |
Approval | |
May. 19, 2020 |
NCT04401579 | |
ClinicalTrials.gov |
United States/Denmark/Korea/Mexico/Singapore/Spain/United Kingdom |