Mar. 25, 2020 |
|
June. 30, 2023 |
|
jRCTs071190054 |
Program of ipragliflozin for endothelial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized-controlled, open-label trial (PROCEED) |
|
Program of ipragliflozin for endothelial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized-controlled, open-label trial (PROCEED) |
Jan. 19, 2022 |
|
111 |
|
The predefined full analysis set (FAS) is the subject of the description. Each item is described in the following order: ipragliflozin group, control group, and the data are indicated as number (frequency in each group), mean +- SD, or median [IQR]. Number of persons in each treatment group: 53 (100%), 55 (100%) Age: 68.0 +- 11.6 years, 69.9 +- 10.5 years Gender (female): 20 (37.7%), 19 (34.5%) BMI: 26.14+-4.51 kg/m2, 24.74+-3.36 kg/m2 Duration of diabetes: 10.88 [4.71, 18.31] years, 13.00 [6.00, 18.00] years HbA1c: 7.3+-0.8%, 7.2+-0.8 eGFR: 58.3+-18.2 mL/min/1.73m2, 59.6+-17.2 mL/min/1.73m2 Urinary albumin-creatinine ratio: 49.50 [17.45, 118.25] mg/g cre, 55.35 [21.25, 116.25] mg/g cre RHI: 1.585+-0.265 (1.580 [1.390, 1.800]), 1.555+-0.251 (1.530 [1.420, 1.755]) LnRHI: 0.447+-0.170 (0.457 [0.329, 0.588]), 0.428+-0.167 (0.425 [0.351, 0.562]) Active smoking_yes: 14 (26.4%), 12 (21.8%) History of hypertension_yes: 43 (81.1%), 46 (83.6%) History of dyslipidemia_yes: 43 (81.1%), 44 (80.0%) History of heart failure_yes: 4 (7.5%), 3 (5.5%) Use of metformin_yes: 24 (45.3%), 31 (56.4%) Use of DPP-4 inhibitor_yes: 30 (56.6%), 38 (69.1%) Use of insulin_yes: 1 (1.9%), 1 (1.8%) Use of GLP-1 receptor agonist_yes: 1 (1.9%), 1 (1.8%) Use of ACE inhibitors_yes: 1 (1.9%), 3 (5.5%) Use of ARB_yes: 34 (64.2%), 37 (67.3%) Use of Ca channel blocker_yes: 25 (47.2%), 25 (45.5%) Use of beta-blockers_yes: 8 (15.1%), 4 (7.3%) Use of statin_yes: 25 (47.2%), 31 (56.4%) |
|
Number of patients who signed informed consent: 179 patients Number of patients enrolled: 111 patients Number of patients who received protocol treatment: 111 patients (Ipragliflozin group: 56 patients / Control group: 55 patients) Discontinued: 6 patients (Ipragliflozin group: 5 patients / Control group: 1 patient) Number of patients who completed protocol treatment: 105 patients (Ipragliflozin group: 51 patients / Control group: 54 patients) |
|
Events reported on periodic report: 2 cases - Drug eruption (Ipragliflozin group) - Weakness in the legs (Ipragliflozin group) Serious adverse event: 7 cases - Pneumonia, Lung cancer (Control group) - Exacerbation of cervical spondylosis (Control group) - Head injury (Control group) - Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Control group) - Surgery for inguinal hernia (Ipragliflozin group) - Acute myocardial infarction (Control group) - Proximal end of the left humerus fracture (Closed fracture) (Ipragliflozin group) |
|
Primary endpoint Change in natural log-transformed RHI (LnRHI) from baseline to 24 weeks after protocol treatment initiation or discontinuation: between-group difference 0.033 (95% CI -0.081 to 0.148), P=0.565 Secondary endpoints (1) Percent change in LnRHI from baseline to 24 weeks after protocol initiation or discontinuation: 22.9% (95%CI -29.1% to 75.0%), P=0.384 2) Prevalence of patients whose LnRHI increased by 15% or more from baseline at 24 weeks after protocol initiation or discontinuation: 28 patients (53.8% in the ipragliflozin group) vs. 25 patients (47.2% in the control group), P=0.416 3) Prevalence of patients with RHI in the normal range (>=2.10) at 24 weeks after initiation or discontinuation of protocol treatment: 9 patients (17.3% in the ipragliflozin group) vs. 15 patients (27.8% in the control group), P=0.185 (4) Prevalence of patients with LnRHI increased by 15% or more from baseline or with RHI in the normal range (2.10 or more) at 24 weeks after initiation or discontinuation of protocol treatment: 28 patients (53.8% in the ipragliflozin group) vs. 26 patients (48.1% in the control group), P=0.433 (5) Prevalence of patients whose LnRHI decreased by 15% or more from baseline at 24 weeks after initiation or discontinuation of protocol treatment: 10 (19.2% in the ipragliflozin group) vs. 16 (30.2% in the control group), P=0.172 |
|
In patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease enrolled in the study, 24 weeks of ipragliflozin treatment, compared to standard therapy, had no statistically significant effect on vascular endothelial function as assessed by the RHI. |
|
June. 30, 2023 |
|
May. 01, 2023 |
|
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1262363623000290 |
No |
|
No |
|
https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs071190054 |
Node Koichi |
||
Saga University Hospital |
||
1-1, 5-chome, Nabeshima, Saga-shi |
||
+81-952-34-2364 |
||
node@cc.saga-u.ac.jp |
||
Tanaka Atsushi |
||
Saga University Hospital |
||
1-1, 5-chome, Nabeshima, Saga-shi |
||
+81-952-34-2364 |
||
tanakaa2@cc.saga-u.ac.jp |
Complete |
Mar. 25, 2020 |
||
Mar. 26, 2020 | ||
110 | ||
Interventional |
||
randomized controlled trial |
||
open(masking not used) |
||
active control |
||
parallel assignment |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1. Adults with >= 30 years |
||
1. Type 1 diabetes |
||
30age old over | ||
No limit | ||
Both |
||
Patients with Type 2 diabetes and established CKD |
||
1) Ipuragliflozin group: |
||
The change amount in RHI automatically calculated by RH-PAT device from baseline to 24 weeks or at discontinuation of the treatment |
||
1. The rate of change in RHI automatically calculated by RH-PAT device from baseline to 24 weeks or at discontinuation of the treatment |
Astellas Pharma Inc. | |
Not applicable |
Saga University Clinical Research Review Board | |
5-1-1, Nabeshima, Saga-City, Saga, Japan, Saga | |
+81-952-34-3357 |
|
crb@mail.admin.saga-u.ac.jp | |
Approval | |
Mar. 11, 2020 |
none |